<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 667 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238212</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty on clinkers captively consumed in cement manufacture and cleared to SEZ units was waived, with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier stay order on identical facts, relying on Notification No. 67/95-CE and its prior view that the appellant had made out a case for interim relief. Recovery was therefore deferred during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 667 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238212</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty on clinkers captively consumed in cement manufacture and cleared to SEZ units was waived, with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier stay order on identical facts, relying on Notification No. 67/95-CE and its prior view that the appellant had made out a case for interim relief. Recovery was therefore deferred during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>