<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 663 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the straight-line method should be used for calculating depreciation on used capital goods for payment under Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, even for the period before the amendment on 27.02.10. As no specific method was prescribed before the amendment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 663 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the straight-line method should be used for calculating depreciation on used capital goods for payment under Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, even for the period before the amendment on 27.02.10. As no specific method was prescribed before the amendment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery of Cenvat Credit, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>