<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 655 -  DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238200</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the order issued by the Assessing Officer (TDS) under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 9th October, 2007. The court ruled that the order was effective from the date of its issuance, rejecting the appellant-Revenue&#039;s argument for a prospective effect. It emphasized that the deductor must comply with the certificate/order and cannot assume its invalidity. No penalty was imposed on the respondent-assessee for following the certificate, and the court highlighted the need to rectify contradictory certificates through appropriate channels. The appeals were dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 655 -  DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238200</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the order issued by the Assessing Officer (TDS) under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 9th October, 2007. The court ruled that the order was effective from the date of its issuance, rejecting the appellant-Revenue&#039;s argument for a prospective effect. It emphasized that the deductor must comply with the certificate/order and cannot assume its invalidity. No penalty was imposed on the respondent-assessee for following the certificate, and the court highlighted the need to rectify contradictory certificates through appropriate channels. The appeals were dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>