<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 309 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158220</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the levy of sales tax on materials supplied by a government division to contractors under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. It granted a stay of realisation of extra demands during the appeal process and directed partial payment of the disputed demand pending appeal resolution. The Court refrained from expressing an opinion on the merits of the dispute but specified amounts to be paid to stay realisation of the balance amount. Additionally, it emphasized the need for efficient resolution of inter-departmental disputes and suggested establishing a Committee for pre-litigation clearance, in line with a Supreme Court directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 309 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158220</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the levy of sales tax on materials supplied by a government division to contractors under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. It granted a stay of realisation of extra demands during the appeal process and directed partial payment of the disputed demand pending appeal resolution. The Court refrained from expressing an opinion on the merits of the dispute but specified amounts to be paid to stay realisation of the balance amount. Additionally, it emphasized the need for efficient resolution of inter-departmental disputes and suggested establishing a Committee for pre-litigation clearance, in line with a Supreme Court directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>