<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 503 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158218</link>
    <description>Material obtained from sales tax authorities and other official sources concerning cancellation of registrations, non-existent firms, accommodation bills and absence of actual purchases was treated as legal evidence relevant to the genuineness of C forms and the underlying inter-State transactions. The court noted that external enquiry material was not inadmissible merely because it was gathered outside the assessment record. A separate complaint of denial of opportunity and breach of natural justice was outside the scope of the referred question and did not affect the answer. The finding that the C forms and supporting transactions were not genuine was sustained against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 503 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158218</link>
      <description>Material obtained from sales tax authorities and other official sources concerning cancellation of registrations, non-existent firms, accommodation bills and absence of actual purchases was treated as legal evidence relevant to the genuineness of C forms and the underlying inter-State transactions. The court noted that external enquiry material was not inadmissible merely because it was gathered outside the assessment record. A separate complaint of denial of opportunity and breach of natural justice was outside the scope of the referred question and did not affect the answer. The finding that the C forms and supporting transactions were not genuine was sustained against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>