https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158205 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to collaterally challenge or obtain refund of tax assessed and collected by authorities of another State under that State's sales tax law. An order under section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, made on a declaration in form F, is only a step in the assessment machinery and does not confer finality or immunity from reassessment, revision, or other statutory scrutiny where the law permits. The underlying controversy whether the movements were stock transfers or inter-State sales was left open for decision in appropriate proceedings before the competent forums. en-us Sat, 13 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:58:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158205 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to collaterally challenge or obtain refund of tax assessed and collected by authorities of another State under that State's sales tax law. An order under section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, made on a declaration in form F, is only a step in the assessment machinery and does not confer finality or immunity from reassessment, revision, or other statutory scrutiny where the law permits. The underlying controversy whether the movements were stock transfers or inter-State sales was left open for decision in appropriate proceedings before the competent forums. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 13 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158205