<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158200</link>
    <description>The amended NDPS scheme created Special Courts with exclusive jurisdiction, but during the transitional period offences committed after the amendment and before complete constitution of a Special Court were triable by the Court of Session. Constitution of a Special Court began with the notification under Section 36(1) and was complete only when a qualified Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge was appointed under Sections 36(2) and (3). The decision also addressed the interaction between the stringent bail regime and the constitutional right to personal liberty and speedy trial, recognising that prolonged pre-trial incarceration in delayed NDPS cases could justify one-time bail directions with safeguards and specified exclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158200</link>
      <description>The amended NDPS scheme created Special Courts with exclusive jurisdiction, but during the transitional period offences committed after the amendment and before complete constitution of a Special Court were triable by the Court of Session. Constitution of a Special Court began with the notification under Section 36(1) and was complete only when a qualified Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge was appointed under Sections 36(2) and (3). The decision also addressed the interaction between the stringent bail regime and the constitutional right to personal liberty and speedy trial, recognising that prolonged pre-trial incarceration in delayed NDPS cases could justify one-time bail directions with safeguards and specified exclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>