<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 330 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158198</link>
    <description>Refusal or retrospective cancellation of an eligibility certificate for sales tax incentive under the industrial incentive scheme must comply with fairness, disclosure of reasons, and an opportunity of hearing. A non-speaking communication that merely refers to a committee decision, without recording reasons, cannot sustain withdrawal of valuable tax concessions. The HC held that the impugned cancellation and rejection were unsustainable because natural justice was not followed, quashed the order, and remitted the matter for a fresh, reasoned decision after hearing the affected unit, with interim protection continued meanwhile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:44:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 330 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158198</link>
      <description>Refusal or retrospective cancellation of an eligibility certificate for sales tax incentive under the industrial incentive scheme must comply with fairness, disclosure of reasons, and an opportunity of hearing. A non-speaking communication that merely refers to a committee decision, without recording reasons, cannot sustain withdrawal of valuable tax concessions. The HC held that the impugned cancellation and rejection were unsustainable because natural justice was not followed, quashed the order, and remitted the matter for a fresh, reasoned decision after hearing the affected unit, with interim protection continued meanwhile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>