https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158174 Freedom of speech and expression was recognised as including the right to receive and impart information, and broadcasting as a mode of expression; however, the use of airwaves was treated as a regulated public resource, not an unfettered private entitlement. The organiser of a sports event could disseminate the event through an appropriate medium, but could not insist on telecasting through a chosen agency or bypass the statutory licensing regime. The broadcasting medium was also said to be unsuited to monopoly by the State or private entities, and its regulation was to be exercised in the public interest through an independent public authority rather than arbitrary executive control. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158174 Freedom of speech and expression was recognised as including the right to receive and impart information, and broadcasting as a mode of expression; however, the use of airwaves was treated as a regulated public resource, not an unfettered private entitlement. The organiser of a sports event could disseminate the event through an appropriate medium, but could not insist on telecasting through a chosen agency or bypass the statutory licensing regime. The broadcasting medium was also said to be unsuited to monopoly by the State or private entities, and its regulation was to be exercised in the public interest through an independent public authority rather than arbitrary executive control. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158174