<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 255 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act was treated as extending to disputes on levy, assessment, collection and enforcement of tax, so a challenge to the mode of entertainment tax collection fell within its competence. On natural justice, the shift from a temporary cash deposit arrangement back to the statutory stamp affixation method was treated as implementation of the existing statutory procedure, not a fresh adverse decision requiring prior hearing. The inconvenience alleged by the assessee was insufficient to establish breach of natural justice. The collection procedure reverting to stamp affixation was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 255 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act was treated as extending to disputes on levy, assessment, collection and enforcement of tax, so a challenge to the mode of entertainment tax collection fell within its competence. On natural justice, the shift from a temporary cash deposit arrangement back to the statutory stamp affixation method was treated as implementation of the existing statutory procedure, not a fresh adverse decision requiring prior hearing. The inconvenience alleged by the assessee was insufficient to establish breach of natural justice. The collection procedure reverting to stamp affixation was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>