https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158131 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is limited to substantial questions of law, and such a question must be formulated before it can reverse concurrent findings. The Supreme Court held that interference without following this statutory mandate was impermissible and that relief could not be granted on sympathy when the plaintiff had repeatedly failed to lead evidence despite adequate ities. The trial court was justified in closing evidence and dismissing the suit, and the High Court's remand and grant of further opportunity were unsustainable in law. The judgment was set aside. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2025 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158131 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is limited to substantial questions of law, and such a question must be formulated before it can reverse concurrent findings. The Supreme Court held that interference without following this statutory mandate was impermissible and that relief could not be granted on sympathy when the plaintiff had repeatedly failed to lead evidence despite adequate ities. The trial court was justified in closing evidence and dismissing the suit, and the High Court's remand and grant of further opportunity were unsustainable in law. The judgment was set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158131