https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238177 The Tribunal directed the Department not to take coercive action pending the hearing of the Stay Petition, allowing an early hearing for the Applicant. It criticized the Department for initiating recovery proceedings during the pendency of stay petitions, emphasizing the unfairness of such actions and the need to adhere to legal precedents set by High Courts. The judgment highlighted delays in processing stay applications due to vacancies and insufficient staffing within the Department, deeming the initiation of recovery proceedings unjust and emphasizing the responsibility of the Department in prolonging the resolution process. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238177 The Tribunal directed the Department not to take coercive action pending the hearing of the Stay Petition, allowing an early hearing for the Applicant. It criticized the Department for initiating recovery proceedings during the pendency of stay petitions, emphasizing the unfairness of such actions and the need to adhere to legal precedents set by High Courts. The judgment highlighted delays in processing stay applications due to vacancies and insufficient staffing within the Department, deeming the initiation of recovery proceedings unjust and emphasizing the responsibility of the Department in prolonging the resolution process. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238177