<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 296 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158114</link>
    <description>Renewal of an eligibility certificate was properly refused where the applicant failed to maintain separate accounts for the manufacturing unit, an essential condition for verifying entitlement to exemption. A short delay in filing the renewal application was treated as condonable, and alleged tax collection in an earlier year could not by itself justify refusal for a later year because each renewal stands separately. However, a demand for security could not rest solely on refusal of renewal and the resulting tax liability; in the absence of recorded good or sufficient reasons showing risk to tax payment, the security demand was invalid and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 296 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158114</link>
      <description>Renewal of an eligibility certificate was properly refused where the applicant failed to maintain separate accounts for the manufacturing unit, an essential condition for verifying entitlement to exemption. A short delay in filing the renewal application was treated as condonable, and alleged tax collection in an earlier year could not by itself justify refusal for a later year because each renewal stands separately. However, a demand for security could not rest solely on refusal of renewal and the resulting tax liability; in the absence of recorded good or sufficient reasons showing risk to tax payment, the security demand was invalid and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>