https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238172 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order as legal and correct. The Commissioner found that the duty liability had not been passed on, refuting unjust enrichment. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's authority to direct refund verification and safeguard revenue interests. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's challenges on remand power, CA certificate validity, and accounting entries, upholding the refund directive for crude palm oil consumption. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238172 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order as legal and correct. The Commissioner found that the duty liability had not been passed on, refuting unjust enrichment. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's authority to direct refund verification and safeguard revenue interests. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's challenges on remand power, CA certificate validity, and accounting entries, upholding the refund directive for crude palm oil consumption. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238172