<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 616 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake, finding no error apparent in the final order dated 09.04.2013. The appellant&#039;s attempt to rectify an error regarding duty liability beyond the limitation period was deemed impermissible as it amounted to rearguing the case. The Tribunal highlighted the availability of legal remedies for addressing grievances with the order and concluded that no rectification was warranted in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 616 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake, finding no error apparent in the final order dated 09.04.2013. The appellant&#039;s attempt to rectify an error regarding duty liability beyond the limitation period was deemed impermissible as it amounted to rearguing the case. The Tribunal highlighted the availability of legal remedies for addressing grievances with the order and concluded that no rectification was warranted in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>