<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 614 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the balance duty, interest, and penalty to the applicants, who had already deposited a substantial amount. The recovery was stayed during the appeal process, with all stay applications allowed. The dispute over manufacturing activity and alleged dummy units was noted, with the Tribunal emphasizing that detailed examination would occur during the appeal hearing. The applicants&#039; request for waiver of predeposit was accepted, providing a clear resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 614 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of the balance duty, interest, and penalty to the applicants, who had already deposited a substantial amount. The recovery was stayed during the appeal process, with all stay applications allowed. The dispute over manufacturing activity and alleged dummy units was noted, with the Tribunal emphasizing that detailed examination would occur during the appeal hearing. The applicants&#039; request for waiver of predeposit was accepted, providing a clear resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>