<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the CENVAT credit of input services for output services can be utilized for excise duty payment. This decision was supported by the interpretation of relevant rules, case law, and return formats, which indicated no restriction on cross-utilization of credits between manufacturing and service provision activities. The Tribunal emphasized the common pool concept for credit utilization by manufacturers and service providers, highlighting the absence of a requirement for separate accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the CENVAT credit of input services for output services can be utilized for excise duty payment. This decision was supported by the interpretation of relevant rules, case law, and return formats, which indicated no restriction on cross-utilization of credits between manufacturing and service provision activities. The Tribunal emphasized the common pool concept for credit utilization by manufacturers and service providers, highlighting the absence of a requirement for separate accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>