<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 608 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the additional grounds of appeal for certain assessment years. The issue of treatment of agricultural income was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further substantiation. The levy of interest under specific sections was to be determined consequentially. Unexplained credits in bank accounts were partially upheld but ultimately deleted for one assessment year. Unexplained liabilities were deleted as the transactions were genuine. Disallowance under section 40A(3) was completely deleted as the payments were made on behalf of principals, not as the assessee&#039;s own expenditure. Appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes and fully allowed for others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 608 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the additional grounds of appeal for certain assessment years. The issue of treatment of agricultural income was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further substantiation. The levy of interest under specific sections was to be determined consequentially. Unexplained credits in bank accounts were partially upheld but ultimately deleted for one assessment year. Unexplained liabilities were deleted as the transactions were genuine. Disallowance under section 40A(3) was completely deleted as the payments were made on behalf of principals, not as the assessee&#039;s own expenditure. Appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes and fully allowed for others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>