<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 323 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158090</link>
    <description>An interlocutory writ order granting interim stay of tax collection, subject to deposit and security conditions, was treated as non-appealable because it did not amount to a final order. The proper remedy identified was to seek early disposal of the original writ petition before the single Judge. On that basis, the writ appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 323 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158090</link>
      <description>An interlocutory writ order granting interim stay of tax collection, subject to deposit and security conditions, was treated as non-appealable because it did not amount to a final order. The proper remedy identified was to seek early disposal of the original writ petition before the single Judge. On that basis, the writ appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>