<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158081</link>
    <description>Patent claims fail where the alleged invention is already publicly known and the applicant claims no exclusive right over the underlying substance. The text states that Butachlor was in public disclosure, and that using a solvent and emulsifying agent to make a herbicide into a marketable emulsion was a well-known pesticide industry process. On those materials, the claimed subject matter lacked novelty and inventive step, exposed the patent to revocation for prior public knowledge, and could not qualify as an invention under the Act. The challenge to dismissal of the infringement suit therefore failed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 380 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158081</link>
      <description>Patent claims fail where the alleged invention is already publicly known and the applicant claims no exclusive right over the underlying substance. The text states that Butachlor was in public disclosure, and that using a solvent and emulsifying agent to make a herbicide into a marketable emulsion was a well-known pesticide industry process. On those materials, the claimed subject matter lacked novelty and inventive step, exposed the patent to revocation for prior public knowledge, and could not qualify as an invention under the Act. The challenge to dismissal of the infringement suit therefore failed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>