<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Modifies Stay Order in Business Auxiliary Services Case Over Marketing Expenses with DTC for Nakshatra Goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15132</link>
    <description>Business Auxiliary Services - it is contended that payment made to DTC was the appellant&#039;s share in the actual marketing expenses incurred by DTC. Thus DTC did not provide any service of promoting or marketing of goods having the brand name of Nakshatra being sold by the appellant - stay order modified - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:42:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Modifies Stay Order in Business Auxiliary Services Case Over Marketing Expenses with DTC for Nakshatra Goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15132</link>
      <description>Business Auxiliary Services - it is contended that payment made to DTC was the appellant&#039;s share in the actual marketing expenses incurred by DTC. Thus DTC did not provide any service of promoting or marketing of goods having the brand name of Nakshatra being sold by the appellant - stay order modified - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:42:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>