https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238131 Reimbursable expenses recovered as actual expenditure were treated as not prima facie liable to service tax, relying on the view that Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 had been struck down as ultra vires. At the same time, letting out property with rent collected was held prima facie to fall within renting of immovable property services, leaving the detailed objections for final hearing. On the stay request, only a limited pre-deposit was ordered and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending appeal, subject to compliance. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238131 Reimbursable expenses recovered as actual expenditure were treated as not prima facie liable to service tax, relying on the view that Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 had been struck down as ultra vires. At the same time, letting out property with rent collected was held prima facie to fall within renting of immovable property services, leaving the detailed objections for final hearing. On the stay request, only a limited pre-deposit was ordered and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending appeal, subject to compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238131