<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 576 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238121</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied the application for modification of the stay order as the appellant failed to present new arguments or evidence supporting financial difficulties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance due to the failure to adhere to the pre-deposit requirement. The decision underscores the importance of complying with court orders and the need for valid grounds when seeking modifications, emphasizing the orderly progression of legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 576 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238121</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied the application for modification of the stay order as the appellant failed to present new arguments or evidence supporting financial difficulties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance due to the failure to adhere to the pre-deposit requirement. The decision underscores the importance of complying with court orders and the need for valid grounds when seeking modifications, emphasizing the orderly progression of legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>