<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 574 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeal for final disposal rather than granting a stay of the Order-in-Appeal. The matter involved the revision of assessable value based on DGOV data, with the adjudicating authority enhancing the value without proper notice. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, with directions for notice issuance, reply filing, and completion of adjudication within three months. Both parties were given liberty to produce evidence, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed via remand, with no opinion expressed on the case&#039;s merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 574 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeal for final disposal rather than granting a stay of the Order-in-Appeal. The matter involved the revision of assessable value based on DGOV data, with the adjudicating authority enhancing the value without proper notice. The case was remanded for a fresh decision, with directions for notice issuance, reply filing, and completion of adjudication within three months. Both parties were given liberty to produce evidence, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed via remand, with no opinion expressed on the case&#039;s merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>