https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238115 The court invoked its powers under section 560(6) of the Companies Act and found that the respondent company's actions did not condone fraud. Emphasizing penalties for false statements in company documents under section 628, the court restored the company's name to the register. The petitioner was allowed to pursue recovery against the company, which was directed to file statutory documents within two months of restoration, overseen by directors. All post-restoration formalities were to be completed within one month, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238115 The court invoked its powers under section 560(6) of the Companies Act and found that the respondent company's actions did not condone fraud. Emphasizing penalties for false statements in company documents under section 628, the court restored the company's name to the register. The petitioner was allowed to pursue recovery against the company, which was directed to file statutory documents within two months of restoration, overseen by directors. All post-restoration formalities were to be completed within one month, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238115