<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to exclude &quot;Rites Limited&quot; as a comparable due to its unique government-backed nature, affirming that it was not suitable for benchmarking against the assessee. The correct application of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) without including extraordinary expenses showed that the assessee&#039;s transactions were at arm&#039;s length. The Tribunal also supported the use of internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) data alongside TNMM, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate profit level indicator (PLI). As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=329849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 550 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to exclude &quot;Rites Limited&quot; as a comparable due to its unique government-backed nature, affirming that it was not suitable for benchmarking against the assessee. The correct application of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) without including extraordinary expenses showed that the assessee&#039;s transactions were at arm&#039;s length. The Tribunal also supported the use of internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) data alongside TNMM, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate profit level indicator (PLI). As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>