<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 321 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158041</link>
    <description>Where statutory objections to a seizure and proposed action under section 29(1) remained undecided, further enforcement of the notice should ordinarily await a reasoned decision on those objections. The authority was required to consider the objections in accordance with law before taking coercive steps, and discretion under the statute had to be exercised soundly so as to avoid unnecessary or futile litigation. The notice was therefore not to be enforced until the objections were adjudicated by a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 321 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158041</link>
      <description>Where statutory objections to a seizure and proposed action under section 29(1) remained undecided, further enforcement of the notice should ordinarily await a reasoned decision on those objections. The authority was required to consider the objections in accordance with law before taking coercive steps, and discretion under the statute had to be exercised soundly so as to avoid unnecessary or futile litigation. The notice was therefore not to be enforced until the objections were adjudicated by a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>