<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 394 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158031</link>
    <description>The revisional power under section 14(4) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 is confined to cases where fresh material not part of the original record later comes to light and justifies reassessment of escaped, under-assessed, or wrongly rated turnover. Mere failure to notice an aspect already available in the assessment record, or non-application of mind to existing material, does not justify reopening. On the facts, the assessment could not be revised merely because the authority had overlooked the purchase of old jewellery from an unregistered dealer and its use in manufacture, so the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 394 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158031</link>
      <description>The revisional power under section 14(4) of the A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 is confined to cases where fresh material not part of the original record later comes to light and justifies reassessment of escaped, under-assessed, or wrongly rated turnover. Mere failure to notice an aspect already available in the assessment record, or non-application of mind to existing material, does not justify reopening. On the facts, the assessment could not be revised merely because the authority had overlooked the purchase of old jewellery from an unregistered dealer and its use in manufacture, so the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>