<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 392 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158027</link>
    <description>Transfer of documents of title during movement of goods from one State to another constitutes an inter-State sale under section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act when the transfer occurs in transit. On the facts found, the documents of title were transferred while the goods moved from Andhra Pradesh to Karnataka, so the statutory condition was satisfied. The asserted consignment character did not prevail over that statutory test, and reliance on uncertified or unacted-upon F forms was irrelevant. The disputed turnover was therefore correctly treated as an inter-State sale, and the challenge to that classification failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 392 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158027</link>
      <description>Transfer of documents of title during movement of goods from one State to another constitutes an inter-State sale under section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act when the transfer occurs in transit. On the facts found, the documents of title were transferred while the goods moved from Andhra Pradesh to Karnataka, so the statutory condition was satisfied. The asserted consignment character did not prevail over that statutory test, and reliance on uncertified or unacted-upon F forms was irrelevant. The disputed turnover was therefore correctly treated as an inter-State sale, and the challenge to that classification failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>