<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s reference to the DVO under section 55A(b)(ii) and allowed the use of the valuation report in the assessment. However, it acknowledged the lack of adequate hearing opportunity by the DVO and directed the AO to obtain a fresh valuation report after providing the assessee a proper hearing. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the AO for a fresh order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s reference to the DVO under section 55A(b)(ii) and allowed the use of the valuation report in the assessment. However, it acknowledged the lack of adequate hearing opportunity by the DVO and directed the AO to obtain a fresh valuation report after providing the assessee a proper hearing. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the AO for a fresh order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>