<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 512 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238057</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were quashed. The Tribunal found that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not validly assume jurisdiction and merely acted on borrowed satisfaction. Consequently, all additions made by the Assessing Officer, including the addition of Rs. 5,92,809 on account of unexplained deposits in the bank account, were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 512 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238057</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act were quashed. The Tribunal found that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not validly assume jurisdiction and merely acted on borrowed satisfaction. Consequently, all additions made by the Assessing Officer, including the addition of Rs. 5,92,809 on account of unexplained deposits in the bank account, were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>