<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 510 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for investment in Sahukhari Byaj business and excess stock in gold jewellery business. However, it reinstated the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions for interest income from Sahukhari Byaj business and income from the jewellery business, directing the exclusion of income declared in regular returns for certain assessment years. The appeals for specific assessment years were partly allowed, while appeals for other years were fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 510 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for investment in Sahukhari Byaj business and excess stock in gold jewellery business. However, it reinstated the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions for interest income from Sahukhari Byaj business and income from the jewellery business, directing the exclusion of income declared in regular returns for certain assessment years. The appeals for specific assessment years were partly allowed, while appeals for other years were fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>