<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 283 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158006</link>
    <description>Government incentive scheme eligibility remained confined to new industrial units satisfying the implementation-date conditions under the Government Order. Where final eligibility was expressly reserved to the State Government, the State Level Committee could not relax or modify those conditions; any such relief required a Government decision. Temporary registration and an eligibility certificate issued subject to ratification created no vested or enforceable right. Cancellation of those provisional benefits without separate notice did not violate natural justice in those circumstances. The industrial unit was ineligible, and relief was limited to seeking relaxation or modification from the State Government in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 283 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158006</link>
      <description>Government incentive scheme eligibility remained confined to new industrial units satisfying the implementation-date conditions under the Government Order. Where final eligibility was expressly reserved to the State Government, the State Level Committee could not relax or modify those conditions; any such relief required a Government decision. Temporary registration and an eligibility certificate issued subject to ratification created no vested or enforceable right. Cancellation of those provisional benefits without separate notice did not violate natural justice in those circumstances. The industrial unit was ineligible, and relief was limited to seeking relaxation or modification from the State Government in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>