<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 345 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158003</link>
    <description>Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act allows the State Government to grant concessional tax rates or exemptions by notification in the public interest. On the facts, a notification fixed a 2 per cent rate for inter-State sales of tanned hides and skins, and a later State sales tax notification exempted tanned and untanned hides and skins from State tax for the relevant assessment year. Because that exemption was operative, non-payment under the State Act could not defeat the concessional Central Sales Tax rate. The revisional authority&#039;s contrary condition was unsustainable, and the levy at 4 per cent was held incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 345 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158003</link>
      <description>Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act allows the State Government to grant concessional tax rates or exemptions by notification in the public interest. On the facts, a notification fixed a 2 per cent rate for inter-State sales of tanned hides and skins, and a later State sales tax notification exempted tanned and untanned hides and skins from State tax for the relevant assessment year. Because that exemption was operative, non-payment under the State Act could not defeat the concessional Central Sales Tax rate. The revisional authority&#039;s contrary condition was unsustainable, and the levy at 4 per cent was held incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>