<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 503 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue department in the case involving Customs duty evasion through the importation of Base Oil as Rubber Processing Oil. M/s K.K. Impex was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 50,00,000/- towards differential duty, and the Power of Attorney holder was ordered to pre-deposit Rs. 5,00,000/- as a penalty within six weeks. Compliance was required by a specified date, with a waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining dues and a stay against recovery pending the appeal. The appellants&#039; arguments lacked substantial evidence to refute the department&#039;s case, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 503 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue department in the case involving Customs duty evasion through the importation of Base Oil as Rubber Processing Oil. M/s K.K. Impex was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 50,00,000/- towards differential duty, and the Power of Attorney holder was ordered to pre-deposit Rs. 5,00,000/- as a penalty within six weeks. Compliance was required by a specified date, with a waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining dues and a stay against recovery pending the appeal. The appellants&#039; arguments lacked substantial evidence to refute the department&#039;s case, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>