<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238036</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs received from a second stage dealer was treated as available where the recipient proved receipt from its immediate registered supplier, payment by cheque, proper credit records, and use of the inputs in manufacture. The department&#039;s allegation that earlier invoices at the upstream level involved no actual movement of goods did not by itself defeat credit, because the recipient was not required to trace the supplier&#039;s source of procurement. Penalty on dealers was also held unsustainable for a period before the specific penal provision for dealers came into force, so the duty demand and penalties were annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238036</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs received from a second stage dealer was treated as available where the recipient proved receipt from its immediate registered supplier, payment by cheque, proper credit records, and use of the inputs in manufacture. The department&#039;s allegation that earlier invoices at the upstream level involved no actual movement of goods did not by itself defeat credit, because the recipient was not required to trace the supplier&#039;s source of procurement. Penalty on dealers was also held unsustainable for a period before the specific penal provision for dealers came into force, so the duty demand and penalties were annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>