<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>FRINGE BENEFIT TAX ON EMPLOYERS SEEMS ULTRA VIRSE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA – BECAUE TAX ON INCOME CAN BE LEVIED ON PERSON WHO HAS EARNED INCOME AND NOT WHO PAID INCOME TO OTHERS OR INCURRED EXPENESES FOR FRINGE BENEFITS.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5319</link>
    <description>Fringe Benefit Tax imposed an additional levy on employers for benefits provided to employees, payable even when the employer has no taxable income. The author contends such employer-incurred expenditures are not income or profit of the employer but benefits of employees, and therefore cannot constitutionally be treated as the employer&#039;s taxable income. Reliance on administrative convenience or the absence of precise employee-level assessments does not, in the author&#039;s view, justify taxing one person for another&#039;s economic gain and so the levy exceeds the constitutional power to tax income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:07:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>FRINGE BENEFIT TAX ON EMPLOYERS SEEMS ULTRA VIRSE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA – BECAUE TAX ON INCOME CAN BE LEVIED ON PERSON WHO HAS EARNED INCOME AND NOT WHO PAID INCOME TO OTHERS OR INCURRED EXPENESES FOR FRINGE BENEFITS.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5319</link>
      <description>Fringe Benefit Tax imposed an additional levy on employers for benefits provided to employees, payable even when the employer has no taxable income. The author contends such employer-incurred expenditures are not income or profit of the employer but benefits of employees, and therefore cannot constitutionally be treated as the employer&#039;s taxable income. Reliance on administrative convenience or the absence of precise employee-level assessments does not, in the author&#039;s view, justify taxing one person for another&#039;s economic gain and so the levy exceeds the constitutional power to tax income.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:07:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>