<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 276 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157998</link>
    <description>Penalty for importing goods without furnishing form XXXI was held unsustainable because the record showed only a technical breach. The goods were used as raw material, duly accounted for in the books, and there was no evidence of suppressed turnover, tax evasion, dishonest conduct, or conscious disregard of the statutory obligation. In these circumstances, the default was treated as a venial lapse rather than contumacious non-compliance, and the penalty levy was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 276 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157998</link>
      <description>Penalty for importing goods without furnishing form XXXI was held unsustainable because the record showed only a technical breach. The goods were used as raw material, duly accounted for in the books, and there was no evidence of suppressed turnover, tax evasion, dishonest conduct, or conscious disregard of the statutory obligation. In these circumstances, the default was treated as a venial lapse rather than contumacious non-compliance, and the penalty levy was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>