<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 263 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157990</link>
    <description>Wires manufactured from tax-paid wire rods falling within the same sub-clause of section 14(iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act are treated as the same commodity for deduction under section 5(2)(a)(va) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, because the declared-goods scheme gives special treatment where input and output remain within the same statutory item. By contrast, wires made from steel rods, rather than wire rods, are treated as a different commercial commodity and remain taxable, subject to the restriction in section 15(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The assessment was therefore required to distinguish between the two sources of manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=328124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 263 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157990</link>
      <description>Wires manufactured from tax-paid wire rods falling within the same sub-clause of section 14(iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act are treated as the same commodity for deduction under section 5(2)(a)(va) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, because the declared-goods scheme gives special treatment where input and output remain within the same statutory item. By contrast, wires made from steel rods, rather than wire rods, are treated as a different commercial commodity and remain taxable, subject to the restriction in section 15(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The assessment was therefore required to distinguish between the two sources of manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>