<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 398 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157972</link>
    <description>Set-off under section 8(1)(a) is available only where a registered dealer purchases tax-paid raw material, uses it in manufacture in the prescribed manner, and sells the finished goods as required by the rules; mere job-work for goods belonging to other registered dealers does not satisfy these conditions, so no set-off is allowed. An appellate authority may examine a point in detail even if the assessing authority dealt with it summarily, because the first appeal requires consideration of the matter in all its aspects; that approach is proper and does not itself give rise to a legal objection. On the facts stated, the assessee&#039;s set-off claim failed and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 398 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157972</link>
      <description>Set-off under section 8(1)(a) is available only where a registered dealer purchases tax-paid raw material, uses it in manufacture in the prescribed manner, and sells the finished goods as required by the rules; mere job-work for goods belonging to other registered dealers does not satisfy these conditions, so no set-off is allowed. An appellate authority may examine a point in detail even if the assessing authority dealt with it summarily, because the first appeal requires consideration of the matter in all its aspects; that approach is proper and does not itself give rise to a legal objection. On the facts stated, the assessee&#039;s set-off claim failed and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>