<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 339 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157964</link>
    <description>Section 2(r)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act was construed in the context of single-point taxation for tendu leaves. The Court held that the requirement that goods be purchased from a registered dealer was not confined to the assessee&#039;s immediate seller where the goods had already suffered tax at the first stage through a registered dealer. Read consistently with the single-point scheme, the provision allowed deduction of the sale price from taxable turnover in such circumstances. The earlier narrower view was not followed after later Supreme Court interpretation of a similar scheme, and the deduction was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 339 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157964</link>
      <description>Section 2(r)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act was construed in the context of single-point taxation for tendu leaves. The Court held that the requirement that goods be purchased from a registered dealer was not confined to the assessee&#039;s immediate seller where the goods had already suffered tax at the first stage through a registered dealer. Read consistently with the single-point scheme, the provision allowed deduction of the sale price from taxable turnover in such circumstances. The earlier narrower view was not followed after later Supreme Court interpretation of a similar scheme, and the deduction was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>