<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 395 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157953</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 17(3)(b)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act is not sustainable where the Commissioner has granted further time or instalments under section 22(4-A) and the tax is then paid in accordance with that relief. The Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction that the dealer could not pay within time, formed on the totality of circumstances, is a material circumstance in assessing whether the default was without sufficient cause. If payment is made within the extended period subject to those conditions, the basis for treating the original delay as penal does not survive. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 395 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157953</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 17(3)(b)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act is not sustainable where the Commissioner has granted further time or instalments under section 22(4-A) and the tax is then paid in accordance with that relief. The Commissioner&#039;s satisfaction that the dealer could not pay within time, formed on the totality of circumstances, is a material circumstance in assessing whether the default was without sufficient cause. If payment is made within the extended period subject to those conditions, the basis for treating the original delay as penal does not survive. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>