<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>section 40A(3) and Rule 6dd Applicability</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105894</link>
    <description>A taxpayer queried whether cash payments to transporters exceeding the statutory ceiling can be allowed as business expenditure when supported by written consent and PAN. The headnote explains that section 40A(3) restricts deductions for such cash payments to prevent fake transactions, and that unless the payment qualifies under the exemptions in Rule 6DD, the expenditure is vulnerable to disallowance despite written confirmation and PAN.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:24:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>section 40A(3) and Rule 6dd Applicability</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105894</link>
      <description>A taxpayer queried whether cash payments to transporters exceeding the statutory ceiling can be allowed as business expenditure when supported by written consent and PAN. The headnote explains that section 40A(3) restricts deductions for such cash payments to prevent fake transactions, and that unless the payment qualifies under the exemptions in Rule 6DD, the expenditure is vulnerable to disallowance despite written confirmation and PAN.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:24:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>