<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CE Tariff clasification of Steam</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105888</link>
    <description>Central excise tariff classification of steam is questioned because the historical chapter 28 entry no longer appears; the central issue is whether steam remains an excisable commodity in the absence of a current tariff entry, and no authoritative clarification is recorded in the exchange.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CE Tariff clasification of Steam</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105888</link>
      <description>Central excise tariff classification of steam is questioned because the historical chapter 28 entry no longer appears; the central issue is whether steam remains an excisable commodity in the absence of a current tariff entry, and no authoritative clarification is recorded in the exchange.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>