<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Amount spent by Customs on opinion</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105822</link>
    <description>The department advises there is no provision to reimburse Customs officers or pay for technical opinions on product classification; statutory duties imposing operational expenses on owners relate to facilitating examination of goods and do not extend to meeting costs of classification opinions, and expert examination reports identify goods but do not bind legal classification or valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:58:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Amount spent by Customs on opinion</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105822</link>
      <description>The department advises there is no provision to reimburse Customs officers or pay for technical opinions on product classification; statutory duties imposing operational expenses on owners relate to facilitating examination of goods and do not extend to meeting costs of classification opinions, and expert examination reports identify goods but do not bind legal classification or valuation.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:58:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>