<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confusion in notification no. 30/2012 WCT-Reg.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105796</link>
    <description>Explanation-II allows a service recipient in works contract services, where both parties are liable under reverse charge, to choose its own valuation method independently of the service provider&#039;s method; this legal independence can produce differing values between parties and thereby provoke disputes during service tax audits, so practical advice is to follow the provider&#039;s method unless there is a strong reason to the contrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:55:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confusion in notification no. 30/2012 WCT-Reg.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105796</link>
      <description>Explanation-II allows a service recipient in works contract services, where both parties are liable under reverse charge, to choose its own valuation method independently of the service provider&#039;s method; this legal independence can produce differing values between parties and thereby provoke disputes during service tax audits, so practical advice is to follow the provider&#039;s method unless there is a strong reason to the contrary.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:55:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>