<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Credit on Advocate services rendered for Closed Office premises in dispute</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105731</link>
    <description>Claiming input tax credit for advocate services paid under the reverse charge depends on eligibility under the CENVAT regime, demonstration of nexus between the legal services and taxable output activity (stronger for manufacturers), compliance with the CENVAT Credit Rules, and timeliness consistent with judicially recognised reasonableness constraints on delayed claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 09:20:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=320033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Credit on Advocate services rendered for Closed Office premises in dispute</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105731</link>
      <description>Claiming input tax credit for advocate services paid under the reverse charge depends on eligibility under the CENVAT regime, demonstration of nexus between the legal services and taxable output activity (stronger for manufacturers), compliance with the CENVAT Credit Rules, and timeliness consistent with judicially recognised reasonableness constraints on delayed claims.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 09:20:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=105731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>