<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>amont received from USA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5333</link>
    <description>Tax treatment of a remittance routed through a third party depends on factual characterisation and proof; if the daughter&#039;s transfer to her father routed via a friend&#039;s account is genuinely a gift and documentary evidence shows the friend merely intermediated without beneficial receipt, it should be treated as a gift rather than taxable income, whereas inadequate proof may invite challenge by tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:51:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=319630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>amont received from USA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5333</link>
      <description>Tax treatment of a remittance routed through a third party depends on factual characterisation and proof; if the daughter&#039;s transfer to her father routed via a friend&#039;s account is genuinely a gift and documentary evidence shows the friend merely intermediated without beneficial receipt, it should be treated as a gift rather than taxable income, whereas inadequate proof may invite challenge by tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:51:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>