<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Material clear against Status Holder Incentive Scrip</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5312</link>
    <description>Whether a supplier must obtain the signature and stamp of its Excise Superintendent or range officer on a duty-debit entry when supplying goods against a Status Holder Incentive Scrip under Notification No. 33/2012; the response directs consultation of the notification&#039;s clauses on required endorsements and verification of debit entries to determine mandatory signatory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:03:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=319611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Material clear against Status Holder Incentive Scrip</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5312</link>
      <description>Whether a supplier must obtain the signature and stamp of its Excise Superintendent or range officer on a duty-debit entry when supplying goods against a Status Holder Incentive Scrip under Notification No. 33/2012; the response directs consultation of the notification&#039;s clauses on required endorsements and verification of debit entries to determine mandatory signatory requirements.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:03:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>