<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>search case law tmi site</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5244</link>
    <description>The reply supplies citations to two Supreme Court decisions and states the controlling proposition: the mere existence of an agreement with selling agents or payment of commission does not, by itself, prove services were rendered or that such payments are wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=319549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>search case law tmi site</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5244</link>
      <description>The reply supplies citations to two Supreme Court decisions and states the controlling proposition: the mere existence of an agreement with selling agents or payment of commission does not, by itself, prove services were rendered or that such payments are wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=5244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>